<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Funny differences between Mysql and Postgresql</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.daniel-lemire.com/blog/archives/2004/11/08/funny-differences-between-mysql-and-postgresql/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.daniel-lemire.com/blog/archives/2004/11/08/funny-differences-between-mysql-and-postgresql/</link>
	<description>Computer Science researcher and Open Scholar: Web, OLAP, Databases, Time Series, Collaborative Filtering, Information Retrieval, e-Learning.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 05:44:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.daniel-lemire.com/blog/archives/2004/11/08/funny-differences-between-mysql-and-postgresql/comment-page-1/#comment-390</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2004 16:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daniel-lemire.com/blog/archives/2004/11/08/funny-differences-between-mysql-and-postgresql/#comment-390</guid>
		<description>As to why MySQL rounds the way it does, that was directly from the MySQL docs.  I didn&#039;t really but it either, but it looks like that is their &quot;official&quot; explanation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As to why MySQL rounds the way it does, that was directly from the MySQL docs.  I didn&#8217;t really but it either, but it looks like that is their &#8220;official&#8221; explanation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.daniel-lemire.com/blog/archives/2004/11/08/funny-differences-between-mysql-and-postgresql/comment-page-1/#comment-347</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2004 17:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daniel-lemire.com/blog/archives/2004/11/08/funny-differences-between-mysql-and-postgresql/#comment-347</guid>
		<description>Hmm.  Should have tried it BEFORE posting the last comment so as to avoid having to post another.  It looks to me like MySQL follows a similar rounding rule, but with even/odd reversed:  if the preceding digit is odd, round up; otherwise round down.  So, for example, 1.5 and 2.5 both round to 2.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm.  Should have tried it BEFORE posting the last comment so as to avoid having to post another.  It looks to me like MySQL follows a similar rounding rule, but with even/odd reversed:  if the preceding digit is odd, round up; otherwise round down.  So, for example, 1.5 and 2.5 both round to 2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.daniel-lemire.com/blog/archives/2004/11/08/funny-differences-between-mysql-and-postgresql/comment-page-1/#comment-346</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2004 17:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daniel-lemire.com/blog/archives/2004/11/08/funny-differences-between-mysql-and-postgresql/#comment-346</guid>
		<description>Regarding the rounding of 0.5, I was also taught that it should round to 1.  But what about 1.5?  I would guess that Daniel was taught that it rounds to 2; I was taught that it also rounds to 1.  I learned this in lab courses in undergraduate physics.  The general rule was (is) that if the digit to the immediate left of the positition being rounded is even, round up; otherwise round down.  The rationale is that otherwise, on average, you will end up
rounding up more often than down, skewing results slightly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the rounding of 0.5, I was also taught that it should round to 1.  But what about 1.5?  I would guess that Daniel was taught that it rounds to 2; I was taught that it also rounds to 1.  I learned this in lab courses in undergraduate physics.  The general rule was (is) that if the digit to the immediate left of the positition being rounded is even, round up; otherwise round down.  The rationale is that otherwise, on average, you will end up<br />
rounding up more often than down, skewing results slightly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Scott's Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.daniel-lemire.com/blog/archives/2004/11/08/funny-differences-between-mysql-and-postgresql/comment-page-1/#comment-345</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Scott's Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2004 02:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daniel-lemire.com/blog/archives/2004/11/08/funny-differences-between-mysql-and-postgresql/#comment-345</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;MySQL&#039;s Funny Math&lt;/strong&gt;
Daniel Lemire came across some funny math in MySQL.  He ran &#039;select 11/5;&#039; and had MySQL give him 2.20, where PostgreSQL gave him 2.  There is nothing wrong with MySQL&#039;s answer, but it might throw off most programmers who be likely to expect the kin...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>MySQL&#8217;s Funny Math</strong><br />
Daniel Lemire came across some funny math in MySQL.  He ran &#8216;select 11/5;&#8217; and had MySQL give him 2.20, where PostgreSQL gave him 2.  There is nothing wrong with MySQL&#8217;s answer, but it might throw off most programmers who be likely to expect the kin&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
