<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Slashdot &#124; String Theory a Disaster for Physics?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.daniel-lemire.com/blog/archives/2006/06/23/slashdot-string-theory-a-disaster-for-physics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.daniel-lemire.com/blog/archives/2006/06/23/slashdot-string-theory-a-disaster-for-physics/</link>
	<description>Daniel Lemire's blog is about life in academia, research in Computer Science, wondering how we can reconcile fast databases and algorithms with the informal and asemantic nature of the world around us. It is broadcasted from Montreal (Canada).</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 19:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kwan Chiang</title>
		<link>http://www.daniel-lemire.com/blog/archives/2006/06/23/slashdot-string-theory-a-disaster-for-physics/#comment-49070</link>
		<dc:creator>Kwan Chiang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2006 19:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daniel-lemire.com/blog/archives/2006/06/23/slashdot-string-theory-a-disaster-for-physics/#comment-49070</guid>
		<description>Please see my website: www.physicsrenaissance.com

It talks about solid angle rotation, which is not strings, but has string behavior and may offer clue to curled up dimensions at electroweak scale.  

Thanks and happy holidays.  

Kwan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please see my website: <a href="http://www.physicsrenaissance.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.physicsrenaissance.com</a></p>
<p>It talks about solid angle rotation, which is not strings, but has string behavior and may offer clue to curled up dimensions at electroweak scale.  </p>
<p>Thanks and happy holidays.  </p>
<p>Kwan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.daniel-lemire.com/blog/archives/2006/06/23/slashdot-string-theory-a-disaster-for-physics/#comment-49060</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 23:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daniel-lemire.com/blog/archives/2006/06/23/slashdot-string-theory-a-disaster-for-physics/#comment-49060</guid>
		<description>There are certaintly other options being looked at, like loop quantum gravity. I can't help but think that if string theory didn't have any promise people wouldn't be looking at it as much---but I'm sure there are people who would call me naive for saying so. At least string theory as an attempt to model the strong nuclear force did make one prediction: gravity!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are certaintly other options being looked at, like loop quantum gravity. I can&#8217;t help but think that if string theory didn&#8217;t have any promise people wouldn&#8217;t be looking at it as much&#8212;but I&#8217;m sure there are people who would call me naive for saying so. At least string theory as an attempt to model the strong nuclear force did make one prediction: gravity!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kwasi</title>
		<link>http://www.daniel-lemire.com/blog/archives/2006/06/23/slashdot-string-theory-a-disaster-for-physics/#comment-10531</link>
		<dc:creator>kwasi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jun 2006 13:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daniel-lemire.com/blog/archives/2006/06/23/slashdot-string-theory-a-disaster-for-physics/#comment-10531</guid>
		<description>I'm just waiting for the Intelligen Design crew to jump on this as proof of why science is biased.

That aside, I've always been worried about how string theory has managed to forge on without ever having to really prove itself. Finally maybe people will start looking at other options</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just waiting for the Intelligen Design crew to jump on this as proof of why science is biased.</p>
<p>That aside, I&#8217;ve always been worried about how string theory has managed to forge on without ever having to really prove itself. Finally maybe people will start looking at other options</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
