<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do you think because you write, or write because you think?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.daniel-lemire.com/blog/archives/2008/07/11/do-you-think-because-you-write-or-write-because-you-think/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.daniel-lemire.com/blog/archives/2008/07/11/do-you-think-because-you-write-or-write-because-you-think/</link>
	<description>Computer Science researcher and Open Scholar: Web, OLAP, Databases, Time Series, Collaborative Filtering, Information Retrieval, e-Learning.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 05:44:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivo Danihelka</title>
		<link>http://www.daniel-lemire.com/blog/archives/2008/07/11/do-you-think-because-you-write-or-write-because-you-think/comment-page-1/#comment-50507</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivo Danihelka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 08:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daniel-lemire.com/blog/archives/2008/07/11/do-you-think-because-you-write-or-write-because-you-think/#comment-50507</guid>
		<description>It is also good to know How to Write a Great Research Paper.
There is a presentation that I found helpful. It has some non-obvious advices
that will make me writing and ideas better:

http://www.cs.iastate.edu/~honavar/Peyton-Jones-Writing.ppt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is also good to know How to Write a Great Research Paper.<br />
There is a presentation that I found helpful. It has some non-obvious advices<br />
that will make me writing and ideas better:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cs.iastate.edu/~honavar/Peyton-Jones-Writing.ppt" rel="nofollow">http://www.cs.iastate.edu/~honavar/Peyton-Jones-Writing.ppt</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SoloGen</title>
		<link>http://www.daniel-lemire.com/blog/archives/2008/07/11/do-you-think-because-you-write-or-write-because-you-think/comment-page-1/#comment-50503</link>
		<dc:creator>SoloGen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 09:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daniel-lemire.com/blog/archives/2008/07/11/do-you-think-because-you-write-or-write-because-you-think/#comment-50503</guid>
		<description>Based on my limited experience, your advice seems to be brilliant. When I write something, I start understanding the topic much better.
Also I guess teaching/giving formal talks about your findings is helpful too. The catch is that if you give a talk on a half-baked idea, others may just kill it! Writing, it seems, doesn&#039;t have the same problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Based on my limited experience, your advice seems to be brilliant. When I write something, I start understanding the topic much better.<br />
Also I guess teaching/giving formal talks about your findings is helpful too. The catch is that if you give a talk on a half-baked idea, others may just kill it! Writing, it seems, doesn&#8217;t have the same problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daiane</title>
		<link>http://www.daniel-lemire.com/blog/archives/2008/07/11/do-you-think-because-you-write-or-write-because-you-think/comment-page-1/#comment-50023</link>
		<dc:creator>Daiane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daniel-lemire.com/blog/archives/2008/07/11/do-you-think-because-you-write-or-write-because-you-think/#comment-50023</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been recently learning more about the review process for the major scientific journals in my area (business). It really seems that the gatekeepers cannot guarantee that &quot;A-list&quot; journal&#039;s content is actually the best research in a field. There are so many other factors involved in determining whether a paper will be published or not... 
I also think that posting on the web is valid and will be more frequently from now on. In this way, readers (academics and practitioners) will determine what is good research and what is not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been recently learning more about the review process for the major scientific journals in my area (business). It really seems that the gatekeepers cannot guarantee that &#8220;A-list&#8221; journal&#8217;s content is actually the best research in a field. There are so many other factors involved in determining whether a paper will be published or not&#8230;<br />
I also think that posting on the web is valid and will be more frequently from now on. In this way, readers (academics and practitioners) will determine what is good research and what is not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
