<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do you think because you write, or write because you think?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.daniel-lemire.com/blog/archives/2008/07/11/do-you-think-because-you-write-or-write-because-you-think/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.daniel-lemire.com/blog/archives/2008/07/11/do-you-think-because-you-write-or-write-because-you-think/</link>
	<description>Daniel Lemire's blog is about life in academia, research in Computer Science, wondering how we can reconcile fast databases and algorithms with the informal and asemantic nature of the world around us. It is broadcasted from Montreal (Canada).</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 18:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Daiane</title>
		<link>http://www.daniel-lemire.com/blog/archives/2008/07/11/do-you-think-because-you-write-or-write-because-you-think/#comment-50023</link>
		<dc:creator>Daiane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daniel-lemire.com/blog/archives/2008/07/11/do-you-think-because-you-write-or-write-because-you-think/#comment-50023</guid>
		<description>I've been recently learning more about the review process for the major scientific journals in my area (business). It really seems that the gatekeepers cannot guarantee that "A-list" journal's content is actually the best research in a field. There are so many other factors involved in determining whether a paper will be published or not... 
I also think that posting on the web is valid and will be more frequently from now on. In this way, readers (academics and practitioners) will determine what is good research and what is not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been recently learning more about the review process for the major scientific journals in my area (business). It really seems that the gatekeepers cannot guarantee that &#8220;A-list&#8221; journal&#8217;s content is actually the best research in a field. There are so many other factors involved in determining whether a paper will be published or not&#8230;<br />
I also think that posting on the web is valid and will be more frequently from now on. In this way, readers (academics and practitioners) will determine what is good research and what is not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
